Look at these examples to see how we use there is and there are.
There's a very big park in my city.
There aren't any street markets.
There are no restaurants in the station.
But there's a café and a bank.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Grammar explanation
Affirmative
We use there is to say that something exists or is in a place.
There is a bridge in the park.
We use there is for singular nouns and there are for plural nouns.
There is a restaurant in the station.
There are two cafés in the shopping centre.
We can say there's instead of there is. We often say this when we speak. But there is no short form for there are.
There is a restaurant in the station. > There's a restaurant in the station.
There are two cafés. >There're two cafés.
When we are speaking informally and make a list of things, we often use there is or there's instead of there are.
There's a café, a supermarket and a bus stop on my street.
(Instead of There are a café, a supermarket and a bus stop on my street.)
Negative
For negatives, we use there isn't or there's not (= there is not) for singular and there aren't (= there are not) for plural.
There isn't a pharmacy near the hotel.
There aren't any restaurants near the hotel.
We often use there isn't a + singular noun, there isn't any + uncountable noun and there aren't any + plural noun.
There isn't a café near here.
There isn't any milk.
There aren't any toilets in the park.
To show that the negative is important, we also often use there is no + uncountable noun and there are no + plural noun. (It is possible to use there is no + singular noun, but it's not as common.)
There's no milk.
There are no toilets in the park.
Questions
For questions, we say Is there for singular nouns and uncountable nouns and Are there for plural nouns.
Is there a café near here?
Is there any milk in the fridge?
Are there any toilets in the park?
To answer, we say Yes, there is (not Yes, there's) or No, there isn't, or Yes, there are or No, there aren't.
Is there a café near here? Yes, there is. / No, there isn't.
Is there any milk in the fridge? Yes there is. / No, there isn't.
Are there any toilets in the park? Yes, there are. / No, there aren't.
Here is a summary of these forms.
singular | plural | |
---|---|---|
affirmative | there is there's |
there are |
negative | there is not there isn't there's not |
there are not there aren't |
negative + a/any | there isn't a ... (countable) there isn't any ... (uncountable) |
there aren't any ... |
negative + no | there is no ... | there are no ... |
question | Is there ...? | Are there ...? |
Other verb tenses
We can use there is and there are in many other verb tenses.
There was a storm last night. (Past simple)
There were a lot of cars on the roads yesterday. (Past simple)
There will be a lot of people at the shopping centre tomorrow. (Future simple)
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello, I am a student teacher from Thailand. I have two questions. 1) Does this sentence use "There is/ There are" correctly? The sentence is "There is a cat, a dog, and a snake." And is there any explanation if it is correct? 2) Is it okay to say "There are a cat, two dogs, and three snakes." ?
Hello MayChalita,
Standard usage is for the verb to agree with the first item in the list:
You can find a discussion of the topic here:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/140854/there-is-there-are-depends-on-plurality-of-the-first-list-element-or-not
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Greetings.
Please, help me with the following:
In this sentence: There is a red and white armchair in the living room.
I would like to know if I can write that sentence: There are a red and white armchair in the living room?
Yes or No? And Why?
Thank you very much for your explanation!
Hi abazurto30,
If you mean there is only one armchair, and it has two colours (red and white), then only There is ... is correct.
If you mean that there are two armchairs, one red and one white, then it would be better to say There are a red and a white armchair in the living room, to make it clearer that there are two.
I hope that helps.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hello dear teachers!
I have a question about there is\are + possesive pronouns, they sound strange to me but do not seem grammarly incorrect. Is it okay to say "There is Jimmy's car"? or "there are my mother's books"?.
The more I think about about the stranger it seems.
Thanks in advance.
Hello Needgrammar,
When 'there is/are' is used to declare something exists, it is indeed wrong to use a noun phrase with a possessive after it. This is because we use 'there is/are' to talk about a non-specific object, i.e. one of a general kind. For example, we could say 'There is a restaurant on Main Street' or even 'There is a McDonald's on Main Street'. But we don't say 'There is my father's restaurant on Main Street' because my father's restaurant is a specific object.
But in an older style of English (which is unusual nowadays), it's also possible to begin a sentence with 'there'. For example, we could say 'There before me stood an old man.' In this case, we've used a word order that was more common in older styles of English but which we occasionally use today (though typically we don't use the verb 'be' in such a sentence). A more modern way to say this is simply 'An old man stood before me'. This kind of language is often used in fantasy novels such as The Lord of the Rings.
But this is not the use of 'there is/are' that is explained on this page.
I hope that helps you make sense of it.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Thank you so much!
Hello, dear teachers and team!
Could you please help me with the following:
I've seen the following sentence in an Oxford Dictionary: "Inside of all of us is a small child screaming for attention". So "there" is missing in this sentence. So, can I say in the same way, for example:
1. In my city are lots of book shopes
2. In the city centre is a good book shop
So, can I skip "there" while not using this structure at the beginning of a sentence!
I'm so much grateful for your precious help and contributing to my knowledge and thank you very much for answering this comment beforehand!
Hello howtosay_,
In certain formal or literary styles, this kind of inversion is occasionally used for rhetorical effect. It's essentially an inversion in which a prepositional phrase (in this instance, 'inside all of us') exchanges place with the subject and thus goes first in the sentence.
I wouldn't recommend you use this sort of style. It's quite unusual and it's likely that people would consider it grammatically incorrect.
It's great that you noticed, this, though!
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Hello, teacher. I’m a student teacher from Thailand. On the upcoming Monday, I will have to teach some groups of people as a final examination, and I will teach them about ‘there is/there are’. The point is I have to write learning objectives in my lesson plan. Can you please suggest me how to write them based on ‘there is/there are’ topic. Thank you