Read clear grammar explanations and example sentences to help you understand how determiners and quantifiers are used. Then, put your grammar knowledge into practice by doing the exercises.
Choose a topic and start improving your English grammar today.
Average
Do you need to improve your English grammar?
Join thousands of learners from around the world who are improving their English grammar with our online courses.
Hello aseel aftab,
Different labels can be applied to determiners. You can find a discussion of this on the relevant wikipedia page in the section headed 'Description':
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determiner
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Abdel El,
We use the definite article when something is specfied for both the speaker and listener. One way to think of this is that if we use the definite article then we can answer the question 'which'.
For example, in your sentence we can ask these questions:
Which country?
Which peace and quiet?
The answers are:
Not just any country, but the country I love.
Not just any peace and quiet, but the peace and quiet you find in the country the speaker loves.
I hope that helps the clarify it for you.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinpour,
I can't be sure, but I think the phrase you heard may have been very much so rather than very much though.
Very much so is a way of agreeing with something in an emphatic way:
You can read more about the phrase here and here.
We do not use very much though as a phrase. The words can occur together, but as separate phrases:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinpour,
'in' is possible, but 'into' is more commonly used and the form I would recommend here. You might also be interested in learning the word 'transmute' (also used with 'into'), which is used an alchemical contexts such as the one you appear to be writing in here.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi Adya's,
On stage and on the stage are both correct but have different uses.
The phrase on stage is actually an adjective or adverb which tells us that a given person is visible to the audience. The opposite is off stage and both phrases can be written as single words (onstage/offstage). It can be used with regard to film as well, or even to other public situations such as television or public meetings: The politician behaved one way onstage and quite another in private.
We can say on the stage to describe where someone is and then we would use the article.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Adya's,
Yes, you can use the form /ðiː/ for emphasis.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi Hosseinpour,
It's good to try to make sense of how prepositions are used, but it's also important to realise that since they are used quite irregularly in English, sometimes you just have to use one or the other depending on the context. The general rules for 'in' and 'on' are summarised on this page. As far as I know, the prepositions are used in the same way with both 'road' and 'street'.
There is also quite a lot of variation in varieties of English -- in other words, in some places, 'in the road' may be more commonly used than 'on the road'. For example, I'd say that 'in the street' is the most commonly used in British English, whereas in American English, 'on the street' is more common. In American English, they also say 'in the street' but it implies being in the middle of the street in many cases.
'It's dangerous to walk in the street' is correct.
I hope this helps -- if you have any other specific questions, please let me know.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi Adya's,
In phrases that discuss blows to or pains in a person's body, we tend to use 'the' instead of a possessive adjective. 'He was hit on the head' is what British native speakers say, not 'on
hishead'.All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinpour,
These are very subtle distinctions. We generally use at with a more general meaning than in. For example:
With some words the distinction is very small and it is really a question of conventions of use and I think both in and at could be used in both examples.
I would say that at a meeting suggests participation in a general sense: going to the place, meeting the people, chatting and also the actual meeting itself. On the other hand in a meeting suggests something more precise: the actual meeting itself from start to finish. However, the distinction is very subtle, as I said.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinour,
The -ing form is not needed here because the word read is intended to fit in the same place as party. We can think of the sentence like this:
I want to party and by party I mean (I want to) read books.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello omar123,
We use this and that with singular reference.
These and those are used with plural reference.
We use this and these to describe something which is close to us in some way. This could be physically close but it could also be close in other ways, such as close in time. For example, if we are inside a house then we would generally use this to describe it, and that to describe another house (next door or across the street). If we talk about time then this generally means the next one ('this weekend', for example) and that generally means the previous one ('last weekend').
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinpour,
Yes, that is correct. We can use to 'had sth done' construction with the meaning of 'this happened to me' to describe unexpected events.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi cbenglish,
That's right, both 'an' and 'the' are possible here. Which one would be better depends on the context. Have you seen our Articles 1 and 2 pages? The explanations there might be useful for you, or if you have a specific context in which you'd say this, please explain it to us and we can suggest which article would be more appropriate in that context.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello cbenglish,
You are correct. No article is used in the first sentence because 'Hinduism' is an abstract noun and so no article is used. You could use the definite article if you want to distinguish between different versions of Hinduism:
In the second sentence the definite article is needed because you are specifying which of a number of religions you are describing. If you talk about religion as an abstract concept then no article is needed:
We do not use articles with the proper names of religions, so we say Islam, Christianity, Hunduism, Judaism, Buddhism and so on. However, if we specify a particular religion by using an adjective then we use the definite article:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Shahid,
If this refers to the name of a pub then The Foolish Stag would be correct. Names of pubs in the UK generally use the definite article (The Dog and Duck, The Garret, The Duke of York etc).
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello amrita_enakshi,
With countable nouns we use the plural form after 'any', and with uncountable nouns we use the singular. 'Infection' can be used as a countable or an uncountable noun and so both singular and plural are possible in this sentence.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Hosseinpour,
The meaning here is either 'I need to leave' or 'I need to start'. For example:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello cbenglish,
The most common option here is 'a but 'the' is also possible and I don't think there is any difference in meaning. The zero article is incorrect here.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello cbenglish,
While there are similar phrases with others than words than level, there is no real consistency in how articles are used with them. For example, we can say in the theoretical realm but not
in a theoretical realmin this kind of context. Thus, I would say that this is best treated as an expression to be memorised rather than the expression of a grammatical rule.Peter
The LearnEnglish Team